Why rating agencies disagree on sovereign ratings
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Do Rating Agencies Exhibit Herding Behaviour? Evidence from Sovereign Ratings
Different rating agencies may have different levels of expertise (reputation) for different countries it is not obvious that such homogeneity holds. We therefore conduct poolability tests within this context to assess this assumption and find evidence of heterogeneity. This leads us to conduct country-by-country timeseries tests, allowing all slope coefficients to vary across countries, to asse...
متن کاملProperty-liability Insurer Financial Strength Ratings: Differences across Rating Agencies
Regulators, investors, consumers, and insurance brokers use insurer financial strength ratings to evaluate the insolvency risk of insurers. This article investigates the factors influencing the decision to obtain a rating or multiple ratings, the determinants of ratings for the three major insurer rating agencies, and reasons for differences in ratings across agencies. This study indicates that...
متن کاملAvoiding the Rating Bounce: Why Rating Agencies Are Slow to React to New Information
Rating agencies state that they take a rating action only when it is unlikely to be reversed shortly afterwards. Based on a formal representation of the rating process, I show that such a policy provides a good explanation for the empirical evidence: Rating changes occur relatively seldom, exhibit serial dependence, and lag changes in the issuers’ default risk. In terms of informational losses,...
متن کاملRATING AGENCIES Harold Cole
For decades credit rating agencies were viewed as trusted arbiters of creditworthiness and their ratings as important tools for managing risk. The common narrative is that the value of ratings was compromised by the evolution of the industry to a form where issuers pay for ratings. In this paper we show how credit ratings have value in equilibrium and how reputation insures that, in equilibrium...
متن کاملA process model to develop an internal rating system: Sovereign credit ratings
The Basel II capital accord encourages financial institutions to develop rating systems for assessing the risk of default of their credit portfolios in order to better calculate the minimum regulatory capital needed to cover unexpected losses. In the internal ratings based approach, financial institutions are allowed to build their own models based on collected data. In this paper, a generic pr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Empirical Economics
سال: 2018
ISSN: 0377-7332,1435-8921
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-018-1503-y